Accessibility Information

Users of assistive technologies such as screen readers should use the following link to activate Accessibility Mode before continuing: Learn more and Activate accessibility mode.

70--REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) FOR TRUSTED HANDHELD PLATFORMS

Solicitation Number: M6785411I2312
Agency: Department of the Navy
Office: United States Marine Corps
Location: MARCORSYSCOM
  • Print
:
M6785411I2312
:
Sources Sought
:
Added: Jun 20, 2011 9:17 am
This is a request for information (RFI) surrounding commercially available or emerging trusted handheld platforms (i.e., smartphones, tablets, etc.). These trusted handhelds contain the ability to host multiple guest operating systems (OSs). The idea is to provide a high level of assurance through a separation kernel and still maintain a high level of functionality through innovative modern mobile operating systems (i.e., guest OSs). The purpose of this RFI is for the Marine Corps to learn more about this emerging technology. The current Department of Defense (DoD) solutions for secure mobile communications fails to provide a low cost, high functional and short procurement timeline for enterprise level deployment.

The desired solution is expected to support secure and unsecure communications for commercial markets. The ideal solution provides a high-assurance commercially-available framework that the DoD can build upon to meet military specific requirements.



BACKGROUND:



Based on various publicly announced partnerships between high assurance platform providers and mobile handheld device manufacturers, the Marine Corps believes this evolving commercial demand, if leveraged appropriately, could help offset the traditional high cost surrounding this capability. Across the DoD, various organizations are establishing programs to remove functionality or “harden” the commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) handheld devices for sensitive communications.

However, this model is extremely difficult to maintain, because by the time the platforms are “hardened”, certified & accredited (C&A) and fielded they become obsolete or unsupported. The problem arises when the acquisition timeline exceeds the platform lifetime. For example, the C&A process takes two years, but the handheld lifetime is only two years. In this example, by the time the handheld is officially fielded, the technology is obsolete. This RFI is soliciting for system architectures and business partnerships that ultimately facilitate low-cost and high-assurance handhelds. The term “high assurance” is defined as at least meeting the common criteria for evaluated assurance level (EAL) of 5+ or above.



REQUEST FOR GENERAL INFORMATION:



1. Describe your organization.

2. Describe your organizations development experience surrounding high assurance platforms.

3. Describe the market (i.e., government or commercial) that this technology might support.

4. Describe the level of demand you anticipate for this technology.

5. Is there potential for a legitimate market outside of the military? What requirements should exist to ensure a larger market?

6. What political or organizational considerations are needed to produce an optimal solution?







GENERAL TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS:



The ideal technical solutions should meet these minimal requirements.



1. A family of small form factor devices (i.e., smartphone and tablet sizes) – with regard to size and weight.

2. Each handheld device can access multiple domains (e.g., internet, intranet, secret).

3. Each handheld device contains multiple commercial wireless interfaces (i.e., personal area network [PAN], wireless local area network [WLAN], wide area network [WAN]).

4. The devices provide high availability for the duration of their expected lifetime.

5. The devices are capable of installing and operating commercially available mobile operation systems.

6. The devices leverage an inherent display to read in direct sunlight and no light.

7. The devices are capable of reporting position location information.

8. The devices using common commercially available device input output (I/O).



9. The devices can store data to a capacity consistent with commercial mobile devices.

10. The devices must leverage commercial demand to offset unit price and benefit from economies of scale.

11. The architecture is designed to facilitate a cross domain solution.



REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL INFORMATION:



1. Is there a commercial sponsor(s) for this type of technology? If so, what are their requirements? If possible, please provide a complete list as an attachment or addendum.

2. What solution can meet the needs of this RFI? Describe your solution that might solve the highlighted problem. Provide a detailed description and drawing(s) to illustrate a proposed solution including an overview of the architecture.

3. What technologies lack maturity to produce an optimal solution?

4. What technical information is needed to produce an accurate (i.e., considering cost, schedule, and performance) proposal?

5. Given your proposed solution, what power limitations are expected?

6. Given your proposed solution, what handheld characteristics are required?

7. Of the requirements listed in the “general technical requirements” section, which ones are infeasible and alternatively which ones are missing?



REQUEST FOR BUSINESS AND LOGISTICAL INFORMATION:



1. Provide a cost estimate for your solution.

2. How long would your proposed solution take to

produce fieldable implementations?

3. What limitations might delay fielding?

4. What logistical considerations are needed?

5. Is your company expecting a commercial or non-

commercial procurement? If a commercial procurement

is expected, what is the expected commercial demand?

6. Has your company already partnered with other key

providers? If so, what partners have you selected

and why?



DISCLAIMER

THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT INTEND TO AWARD A CONTRACT ON THE BASIS OF THIS RFI OR OTHERWISE PAY FOR INFORMATION RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO THE RFI.





This RFI is issued for information and planning purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation. All information received in response to the RFI that is marked “proprietary” will be handled accordingly. The Government shall not be liable for or suffer any consequential damages for any proprietary information not properly identified. Proprietary information will be safeguarded in accordance with the applicable Government regulations. Responses to the RFI will not be returned nor will the Government confirm receipt of the RFI response. Whatever information is provided in response to this RFI will be used to access tradeoffs and alternatives available for determining how to proceed in the acquisition process.

In accordance with FAR 15.201(e), responses to this RFI are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract. The anticipated North American Industry Classification System Code (NAICS) for this requirement is 334119—Other Computer Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing. Small businesses are strongly encouraged to provide responses to this RFI, in order to assist Marine Corps Systems Command in determining the potential levels of interest, competition and technical capability to provide the required services within the Small Business community.



SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS:



Responses should include the (1) business name and address; (2) name of company representative and their business title; (3) contract vehicles that would be available to the Government for the procurement of the product and service, to include General Service Administration (GSA), Federal Supply Schedules (FSS), or any other Government Agency contract vehicle.



The responses should be in a white paper format, no longer than twenty-five (25) pages in length.

Responses to this RFI are due 15 July 2011, at 5:00 Eastern, (DST). Contact Captain Joshua Dixon with any applicable questions at joshua.dixon@usmc.mil





:
M67854 MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS COMMAND Quantico, VA
:
Capt Josh Dixon (703) 432-4203
joshua.dixon@usmc.mil